The movable property had not been physically moved in the context of the transfer and the business activities of BV D had not changed. It followed that BV D had fully continued its economic activity/enterprise and had therefore not (partially) transferred it, so that there could therefore be no question of a transfer of (part of an) company to X within the meaning of Section 37d of the VAT Act.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Rules Sale-and-Leaseback Property Transfer Not Exempt from Transfer Tax
- Court Ruling: VAT Directive Violations, Zero Rate Conditions Unmet, Tax Reassessed, Penalties Partially Overturned
- Faster VAT Entrepreneur Qualification in Real Estate Transactions: Key Considerations and Legal Insights
- VAT Exemption for Bitcoin Exchange Transactions Under EU Court Ruling
- Netherlands Proposes New VAT Rules for Digital Platforms Offering Short-Term Rentals and Passenger Transport
