VAT – whether certain Organix and Nakd bar products fell within exception to zero-rating as “confectionery” in Item 2 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 of VATA 1994 – relevant test regarding error of law where allegation tribunal failed to take account of relevant factor – whether necessary to show FTT perverse in failing to take account of factor- no – whether FTT erred in ruling out of consideration healthiness, and comparison of ingredients in traditional confectionery on basis of case-law (High Court decisions in Kalron and Premier Foods) – yes –whether errors material applying test set out by Court of Appeal in Degorce- yes- appeal remitted to FTT for new decision
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust Wins Appeal: Locum Doctor Supplies Exempt from VAT
- Call to Remove VAT on Sunscreen Amid Rising Skin Cancer Rates in Wales
- HMRC Releases New Guidelines on Freeports Compliance and Tax Benefits
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds: Alternative Evidence Valid for VAT Deduction
- UK Supreme Court Rules Uber Must Pay VAT on Private Hire Services, Impacting Industry
