VAT – whether certain Organix and Nakd bar products fell within exception to zero-rating as “confectionery” in Item 2 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 of VATA 1994 – relevant test regarding error of law where allegation tribunal failed to take account of relevant factor – whether necessary to show FTT perverse in failing to take account of factor- no – whether FTT erred in ruling out of consideration healthiness, and comparison of ingredients in traditional confectionery on basis of case-law (High Court decisions in Kalron and Premier Foods) – yes –whether errors material applying test set out by Court of Appeal in Degorce- yes- appeal remitted to FTT for new decision
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Should Lower or Abolish VAT Threshold to Boost Small Business Growth and Efficiency
- Lowering VAT Threshold Risks Breaching Labour’s Manifesto, Warns Self-Employed Association
- UK VAT Threshold Debate: Growth-Boosting Increase or Revenue-Raising Decrease at Autumn Budget?
- Chancellor Proposes Raising VAT Registration Threshold to £100,000 to Boost UK Economy
- ICS2 Implementation for Northern Ireland: Transition Details and Support for Carriers by HMRC
