According to the CJEU, Article 131 and Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive, read in conjunction with the principles of fiscal neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality, do not stand in the way of a national regulation that prohibits, during the administrative procedure leading to the adoption of the additional assessment, led – in particular after the tax audit but before the determination of that assessment – to present and accept new evidence demonstrating that the substantive requirements of Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive have been met, insofar as the principles of equivalence and effectiveness are respected.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT Neutrality and Tax Fraud: Implications of Recent Jurisprudence
- Blog Luc Dhont: How Can Multinationals Comply with VAT on Transfer Pricing Adjustments Post-ECJ Arcomet?
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
- Briefing document & Podcast – C-409/04 (Teleos): Physical Movement & Supplier Due Diligence Key for Intra-EU VAT Exemption
- EU boosts tax cooperation with Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and San Marino
