According to the CJEU, Article 131 and Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive, read in conjunction with the principles of fiscal neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality, do not stand in the way of a national regulation that prohibits, during the administrative procedure leading to the adoption of the additional assessment, led – in particular after the tax audit but before the determination of that assessment – to present and accept new evidence demonstrating that the substantive requirements of Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive have been met, insofar as the principles of equivalence and effectiveness are respected.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
- New General Court VAT case – C-914/25 (Modelo Continente Hipermercados) – No details known yet
