According to the CJEU, Article 131 and Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive, read in conjunction with the principles of fiscal neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality, do not stand in the way of a national regulation that prohibits, during the administrative procedure leading to the adoption of the additional assessment, led – in particular after the tax audit but before the determination of that assessment – to present and accept new evidence demonstrating that the substantive requirements of Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive have been met, insofar as the principles of equivalence and effectiveness are respected.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECG T-96/26 (TellusTax Advisory) – Questions – VAT deductions in the event of different VAT treatment between Member States
- VIDA Measures applicable from 1 January 2027
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 7 Judgments and 2 Hearings till March 25, 2026
- Comments on T-638/24: Double dip alert – an incorrect invoice can create multiple VAT liabilities
- VAT IOSS Scheme: Intermediary Registration Available from April 2026 for Non-EU Businesses
