Bombay High Court in the case of Rochem India Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI, [TS-60-HC(BOM)-2023-GST], has held that order of Appellate Authority shall not enforced till the period of filing of appeal before Appellate Authority is lapsed.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (‘CBIC’) has given an affidavit in the Court that no hardship will be faced by the taxpayers due to non-constitution of GST Tribunals.
Source Gaba & Co
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
