The Orissa High Court directed the Appropriate Authority to consider difficulty faced by contractors due to change in GST regime on works contract. By way of the writ petition, the Petitioner, M/s. Nobadurga Construction Pvt. Ltd, has challenged the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising out of change in tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) with effect from 1st July, 2017.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- High-Value Transactions Now Automatically Reported to Tax Authorities, Even If Not Disclosed in ITR
- GST Compliance for CFOs: Strategic Risk Mitigation and Operational Efficiency in Indian Enterprises
- Supreme Court: Rooh Afza Classified as Fruit Drink, Attracts Only 4% VAT in UP
- India IRN vs Europe CTC: Key Differences in E-Invoicing Models, Clearance, and Reporting
- India’s 2026 E-Invoicing Rules: Turnover Limits, 30-Day Reporting, and Mandatory 2FA Explained
