The Court of Appeal has dismissed Greenspace’s appeal. The Court of Appeal considered that the FTT and UT’s approach to the issue was not correct. The issue was not whether something was ‘for a roof’ or was a roof. The correct approach was simply to ask whether Greenspace was supplying insulation for roofs, using the ordinary meaning of those words.
Source: deloitte.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
- Navigating UK VAT: Key Considerations and Pitfalls in Exporting Goods
- HMRC’s New VAT Error Correction Rules: Stricter Penalties and Reporting Changes Explained
- UK Supreme Court Confirms VAT on Intragroup Fees for Former VAT Group Members
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
