The Court of Appeal has dismissed Greenspace’s appeal. The Court of Appeal considered that the FTT and UT’s approach to the issue was not correct. The issue was not whether something was ‘for a roof’ or was a roof. The correct approach was simply to ask whether Greenspace was supplying insulation for roofs, using the ordinary meaning of those words.
Source: deloitte.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Looking Again At Options To Tax supplies of land or buildings
- High Court Rules Curaçao Bank Unaware of £220m VAT Fraud, Dismissing Liquidators’ Claims
- Hippodrome Casino’s VAT Recovery Appeal Rejected by Tribunal, Standard Method Upheld
- Rethinking Britain’s VAT: Simplify Rules and Expand Coverage for Economic Stability
- UK Implements EPR Scheme for Packaging, Modulated Fees Begin in 2026
