This case highlighted the importance of adequate record keeping and the maintenance of a clear audit trail to evidence all transactions, supplies and purchases. The appellant was refused a substantial VAT repayment because there was not sufficient evidence to support the VAT liability of the supplies concerned. It is important that all taxpayers maintain all records legally required for a minimum of 6 years to avoid any VAT assessments and penalties based on insufficient records. Similarly, if a taxpayer has declared VAT at an incorrect (higher) rate than is legally correct, it will be necessary to ensure that the reason for any VAT accounting error can be explained and demonstrated to HMRC’s satisfaction before any VAT refund claim is authorised.
Source Constable
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- VAT Input Tax Denial Under Kittel Principle – Appeals Allowed Against HMRC
- SK Metals Ltd v HMRC: VAT Input Tax Deductibility and MTIC Fraud Knowledge
- UK Chancellor Considers VAT Rate Adjustments and Threshold Changes in Upcoming Budget
- Upper Tribunal Rules Cosmetic Treatments by Medical Professionals Can Qualify for VAT Exemption
- High Court Rules Interest Payable on VAT in Contract Dispute Settlement
