In an answer to a preliminary question, the CJEU decided that the provisions of the Directive on the common system of value added tax prevent the authorities of a Member State from considering that the place of provision of a service is in the Member State of the service provider, even if would prove a fraudulent intention to change the place of service provision. The only fiscally competent state from a VAT perspective remains the one in which the recipient of the service is established.
Source: filipandcompany.com
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- European Parliament Approves Simplifications to Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: In-game gold: AG Kokott’s advice on VAT exemption, vouchers & margin scheme
- AG Kokott’s Opinion: VAT Exemption, Vouchers, and Margin Scheme for In-Game Gold Trading
- EU Reaches Agreement on 2028 Customs Reform
- VAT and Transfer Pricing: ECJ’s Arcomet Decision Clarifies Intra-Group Service Remuneration and VAT.
