In an answer to a preliminary question, the CJEU decided that the provisions of the Directive on the common system of value added tax prevent the authorities of a Member State from considering that the place of provision of a service is in the Member State of the service provider, even if would prove a fraudulent intention to change the place of service provision. The only fiscally competent state from a VAT perspective remains the one in which the recipient of the service is established.
Source: filipandcompany.com
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ C-167/26 – ECJ/CJEU will review case EGC Case T-689/24 RX – VAT deduction & invoice timing
- Comments on ECJ C-521/24: CJEU Rules Against Hungary’s Strict Formalism in VAT Deduction for Late Invoices
- Comments on ECJ C-515/24: ECJ Upholds Spanish VAT Deduction Ban for Entertainment Expenses at Accession
- Scope of Standstill Clause in VAT Directive for New EU Member States: Spanish Representation Expenses
- EU Refers Spain to Court for Failing to Transpose VAT Directives into National Law
