This case concerns Bicester Property Interiors Limited (BPIL)’s appeal against HMRC’s decision to issue default surcharges for the VAT periods of 04/20, 01/21 and 04/21. It was not disputed that BPIL fell into default in a number of VAT periods, however BPIL took the view it had a reasonable excuse and therefore penalties should not be applied.
Source Constable
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Updates VAT Refund Guidance for New Charity Buildings and DIY Housebuilders Scheme
- Supreme Court Rules NHS Trusts Must Charge VAT on Car Parking Without Binding Legal Exemption
- VAT Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Accepts Combined Personal and Operational Crises as Reasonable Excuse
- HMRC Signals VAT Reform: Care Home Crackdown and Major Capital Goods Scheme Threshold Hike
- HMRC v Moir Management: Penalties for Failure to Notify Notifiable Arrangements and Reasonable Excuse Considered
