The Court of Justice of the EU recently ruled in the Vittamed case (No. C-293/21). In short, the CJEU finds that VAT must be revised if investment goods due to a corporate liquidation are not and will not be used for business activities for which the business is entitled to recovery of VAT on costs. In this article, we discuss this important outcome and discuss the consequences in practice.
Source: bakertilly.nl
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT Compliance for Online Sellers: Essential Tips for Digital Goods
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Luko): Loyalty Points Not Free for VAT Purposes in Lyko Case (AG)
- EU VAT Reforms Boost Revenue: €88 Billion Collected via OSS and IOSS Since 2021
- Do Loyalty Program Points Qualify as Vouchers? CJEU to Decide on VAT Implications
- Court Rules Sudoku Books as Periodicals: Implications for VAT and Tariff Classification
