The Court of Justice of the EU recently ruled in the Vittamed case (No. C-293/21). In short, the CJEU finds that VAT must be revised if investment goods due to a corporate liquidation are not and will not be used for business activities for which the business is entitled to recovery of VAT on costs. In this article, we discuss this important outcome and discuss the consequences in practice.
Source Baker Tilly
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Must Intensify Efforts Against Tax Fraud and Corruption, Says Chief Prosecutor
- Complex Interplay: Transfer Pricing and VAT Challenges for Multinational Corporations in the EU
- Complex Interplay: Transfer Pricing and VAT Challenges for Multinational Corporations in the EU
- German E-Commerce Group Achieves Multi-Country VAT Compliance Post-OSS Suspension with hellotax Support
- Virtual Currency Taxation: Analyzing VAT Implications in Gaming Post Case C-472/24
