The judge found to be unambiguous the (now amended) provision allowing UK taxpayers to charge VAT on a discounted price even where the full price was received, and felt that it would exceed the boundaries of interpretation if it gave that provision an EU law-consistent meaning (which would in any case require VAT to be paid on the actual consideration received).
Source Fabian Barth
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Court Rules HMRC Wrongly Denied Hotel Supplier’s £10.2 Million VAT Claims
- New Updates on Correcting VAT Errors: Key Changes and Guidance for Businesses
- Tribunal Rules on VAT Status of Government Grants for Free Educational Services by Colleges
- Colleges Win £2.8 Million Tax Rebates Amid VAT Rule Dispute with HMRC
- The UK Should Lower or Abolish, Not Raise, Its VAT Registration Threshold
