The Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden rules that X cannot prove that the additional assessment has been imposed for an excessive amount. X’s records do not show that goods were sold in Germany or sent to Germany. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation unfounded without further motivation
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Balcony Glazing Installation Not Considered Energy-Saving Insulation Under Dutch VAT Law
- Five VAT Knowledge Group Positions Withdrawn Due to New Reduced VAT Rate Decision
- Two VAT Zero-Rate Positions Withdrawn Following New Decision Effective February 2026
- General Supervision Trumps Outsourcing: BV Qualifies as Own Constructor for VAT Reverse Charge Scheme
- VAT reverse charge mechanism and owner-buildership: overall management prevails over full outsourcing
