The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“the High Court”) in the case of M/s. Bimal Kothatri v. Assistant Commissioner (DSGST) & Ors. [(W.P.(C) 9207/2019 & CM No. 37947/2019] dated November 01, 2022, held that cancellation of GST registration is not sustainable when no notice was serviced upon the registered person for conducting physical verification of business premise under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”) which was not given, clearly violating the provision of the law.
Source a2ztaxcorp
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST: India’s Grand Federal Bargain Becomes Imperfect Political Compromise After Eight Years
- GST 2.0 Boosts Bengal’s Economy with Rate Cuts on Local Goods and Industries
- Finance Minister Addresses GST Transition Concerns, Outlines Measures for Smooth Implementation
- Rajasthan HC Rules Principal-to-Principal Service Contracts as Export, Not Intermediary, Under GST
- CBAM Compliance Guide for Indian Exporters: 2025–26 Edition
