The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“the High Court”) in the case of M/s. Bimal Kothatri v. Assistant Commissioner (DSGST) & Ors. [(W.P.(C) 9207/2019 & CM No. 37947/2019] dated November 01, 2022, held that cancellation of GST registration is not sustainable when no notice was serviced upon the registered person for conducting physical verification of business premise under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”) which was not given, clearly violating the provision of the law.
Source a2ztaxcorp
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Dine-in, Takeaway, and Delivery App Orders: Rates, Compliance, and Reporting Differences
- Ensuring ITC Compliance: Mastering GSTR-2B Reconciliation and Audit Readiness for 2026
- India’s E-Invoicing Rules: Scope, Formats, Penalties, and Compliance Under the GST Framework
- Continuous Supply of Services Under GST: Legal Criteria Versus Commercial Practice Explained
- Tripura HC: ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s Tax Default
