Taxable persons occasionally face accusations raised by their tax office that they ought to have known about fraud committed by another person from whom they have purchased goods or supplies of services. As a result, the tax office denies them the deduction of input VAT and/or the VAT exemption for intra-Community supplies. The ECJ has now ruled that the denial of corresponding tax advantages may also go beyond the actual tax loss that the tax authorities have suffered in the supply chain (judgment of 24 November 2022 – C-596/21 – Finanzamt M). Taxable persons should take precautions to avoid being exposed to the accusation that they “ought to have known” about the commission of a particular fraudulent act.
Source: kmlz.de
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases -8 Judgments, 1 AG Opinion and 1 Hearing till March 12, 2026
- General Court VAT Case: T-880/25 (Czechanowicz Ekologia i Zielen) – Questions – Invoice‑Level Data Requirements in EU VAT Refunds
- General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – Questions – Transfer of a Totality of Assets: Economic Continuity vs. Supplier Intention
- Business Leaders Call on EU to Modernize Customs Union and Revive Türkiye Membership Talks
- EU VAT Compliance Gap Hits €128 Billion in 2023, Driven by Six Major Economies
