The court rules that the plaintiff does not owe any reverse charge tax on the services of the American company. This is because the services of this company can be regarded as brokerage in securities for which the exemption of Article 11, first paragraph, letter i, second, of the VAT Act applies.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema
- No VAT group according to AG due to lack of financial interconnectedness
- VAT in 2026: mark these deadlines in your calendar
- Supreme Court Upholds Additional VAT Assessment Due to Insufficient Proof Against Revenue Reconstruction
- Tourist Tax Included in VAT Base for Campsite Services, Supreme Court Rules
