The Allahabad High Court Division Bench of Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit is to examine whether the Rule 96(10)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 is in ultra vires or within the limits of Section 16(3)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017. The contention of the petitioner in the writ petition filed is that the prohibition under Rule 96(10)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017 which has been brought into effect from 9.10.2018 is in contravention of the enabling provision under Section 16(3)(b) of the IGST Act, as it curtails the right conferred under the Act.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- High-Value Transactions Now Automatically Reported to Tax Authorities, Even If Not Disclosed in ITR
- GST Compliance for CFOs: Strategic Risk Mitigation and Operational Efficiency in Indian Enterprises
- Supreme Court: Rooh Afza Classified as Fruit Drink, Attracts Only 4% VAT in UP
- India IRN vs Europe CTC: Key Differences in E-Invoicing Models, Clearance, and Reporting
- India’s 2026 E-Invoicing Rules: Turnover Limits, 30-Day Reporting, and Mandatory 2FA Explained
