In the Humda judgment (case C 397/21), the Court ruled once again that if the customer can no longer reclaim (erroneously charged) VAT from his supplier, the tax authorities are obliged to refund these VAT amounts within a reasonable period of time.
Source VATconsult
See also
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
- VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Insights from Acromet Towercranes Case
- CJEU Ruling: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Impact VAT in Arcomet Case (C-726/23)
- EU Court of Justice Rules Transfer Pricing Payments Subject to VAT in Arcomet Case
