The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad held that no demand can be made for extended period of limitation when no intention to evade payment of service tax. M/s. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, the appellant has filed the appeal to assail the order dated passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax, by which the demand has been confirmed and an order for recovery from the appellant under the proviso to action 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 with interest and penalty.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- High-Value Transactions Now Automatically Reported to Tax Authorities, Even If Not Disclosed in ITR
- GST Compliance for CFOs: Strategic Risk Mitigation and Operational Efficiency in Indian Enterprises
- Supreme Court: Rooh Afza Classified as Fruit Drink, Attracts Only 4% VAT in UP
- India IRN vs Europe CTC: Key Differences in E-Invoicing Models, Clearance, and Reporting
- India’s 2026 E-Invoicing Rules: Turnover Limits, 30-Day Reporting, and Mandatory 2FA Explained
