Advocate General Ettema concludes that there is no disbursement. X bv owes the levy itself.
X bv operates various forest parks, chalet parks and campsites. In addition to the rent for the chalets it receives, X bv also receives a contribution from park holidaymakers who own a chalet. X bv will charge both the tenants and the owners € 1.25 per m³ of water in connection with the purification levy charged to it. It is in dispute whether VAT should be calculated on the amount of sewage treatment levy charged on.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
