The Customs, Exercise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has recently, while deciding an appeal filed before it by the Revenue, held that when the goods imported are not prohibited, then no confiscation u/s 111(d) is possible. The aforesaid observation was made by the Tribunal when the Revenue had preferred an appeal before it, against the Order-in-Appeal Seaport C.Cus. II No. 184/2022, dated 31.03.2022, passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), Chennai, whereby the respondent assessee’s appeal was allowed by the First Appellate Authority, coupled with an order to provisionally release the impugned goods.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- Understanding GST Vouchers: Classification, Tax Implications, and Key Distinctions from Discounts and Services
- IMF Economist Urges India to Adopt Single GST Rate and Direct Revenue Redistribution to Citizens
- BJD Urges Odisha Government to Cut VAT on Petrol, Diesel Amid Global Fuel Crisis Concerns
- Strategic Management of GST Credit Notes: Compliance, Timing, and Tax Implications for Finance Leaders
- Himachal Pradesh Assembly Approves VAT Bill, Permits Up to ₹5 Cess on Petrol, Diesel
