Schematically presented, investment fund A, according to the sub-participation agreement that the taxpayer in the main proceedings intends to conclude, pays bank B an amount in advance when that agreement is concluded. Bank B (hereinafter “the originator”), which has lent money to C (hereinafter “the principal debtor”), in return for that payment agrees to pay investment fund A (hereinafter “the sub-participant”) the income that the originator receives from the original loan agreement with the principal debtor. In this case, the cash flow and risk are withdrawn from the balance sheet of the originator and transferred to the investment fund to which the present case relates, but the originator retains legal title to the relevant assets.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
- Briefing document & Podcast – C-409/04 (Teleos): Physical Movement & Supplier Due Diligence Key for Intra-EU VAT Exemption
- EU boosts tax cooperation with Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and San Marino
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-271/06 (Netto Supermarkt) – VAT exemption granted if fraud undetectable with due commercial care
- Switch to New EU Portal for Customs Applications and CBAM Access Starting 2026
