Schematically presented, investment fund A, according to the sub-participation agreement that the taxpayer in the main proceedings intends to conclude, pays bank B an amount in advance when that agreement is concluded. Bank B (hereinafter “the originator”), which has lent money to C (hereinafter “the principal debtor”), in return for that payment agrees to pay investment fund A (hereinafter “the sub-participant”) the income that the originator receives from the original loan agreement with the principal debtor. In this case, the cash flow and risk are withdrawn from the balance sheet of the originator and transferred to the investment fund to which the present case relates, but the originator retains legal title to the relevant assets.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Playing Music Without Required License Is a Taxable Service, Says Advocate General
- PEM Zone: Implementation Status and Legal Fragmentation of Revised Origin Rules from January 2026
- Innovative Customs Education Workshop Spurs Collaboration; Final Chance for Universities to Apply for EU Recognition
- Briefing documents & Podcasts: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
- Navigating VAT Exemptions: Recent ECJ Judgments and Their Implications for Intra-Community Transactions and Imports
