In this case, a Dutch company operated various vacation parks and camping and chalet parks, as well as a campsite. The company charged the tenants and the owners a ‘purification levy’. The question was if this levy was subject to VAT (as the tax authorities argued) or if this levy was a ‘reimbursement’ (as the company argued).
According to the AG, the charge cannot be regarded a ‘pass-through-, or reimbursement. The AG advises the Supreme Court to declare the appeals in cassation unfounded.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Creator royalty fee on resale NFT is subject to VAT
- Are Practice Nurses Eligible for VAT Exemption on Medical Services?
- How to Use OSS VAT for EU E-commerce When Shipping from a Dutch Warehouse
- VAT levy on data for ‘free’ social media services: The Netherlands is waiting for Europe
- The Netherlands: Comprehensive VAT Country Guide (2026)














