The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X did not provide the medical services in its own name. It does not follow from the documents submitted by X that it carries out the observations in its own name. The inspector therefore rightly imposed the additional VAT assessment on X.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Bill to Implement EU VAT in the Digital Age Directive: Single VAT Registration Provisions
- Sale of Building Plots Is a VAT-Taxable Business Activity, Not a Private Transaction, Court Rules
- Registration fees of victims of a lottery compensation for services for consideration
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Iris Photo Products; Court Rules Not Qualifying as Art Objects
- Discriminatory requirement of tax representative does not stand in the way of zero VAT rate for excise goods
