Advocate General Rantos concludes that art. 9a EU Implementing Regulation 282/2011 is valid. Indeed, this provision takes into account the essential general objectives of art. 28 VAT Directive and is necessary or useful for the implementation of that article.
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-101/24 (Xyrality) – Judgment on app stores as VAT commissionaires
- ECJ Confirms Deemed Reseller Rule for App Store In-App Purchases
- VAT Challenges in Toll Manufacturing: Goods vs Services Classification Issues
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
