Advocate General Rantos concludes that art. 9a EU Implementing Regulation 282/2011 is valid. Indeed, this provision takes into account the essential general objectives of art. 28 VAT Directive and is necessary or useful for the implementation of that article.
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Germany: Two Convicted in €200 Million VAT Fraud and Hawala Money Laundering Scheme
- EU Triple-Chain VAT Invoice Correction Case in Austria
- VATupdate’s Free Interactive Tool: ECJ & General Court VAT Case Finder: 1,315 VAT cases searchable by article, sub-article, topic and status
- VATupdate’s Free Interactive Tool: EU E-Invoicing & E-Reporting Matrix – Check Every Scenario, in Every Member State
- EGC Customs T-28/25 (Hauptzollamt A) : AG Includes Design Costs and Component Buying Commissions in Customs Value
