The Principal Bench of New Delhi Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that documents stating the name of the importer become valid when the statement u/s 138 B of the Customs Act, 1962 turns irrelevant. The Appellants were represented by Shri Sansar Chand and Shri Mohinder Singh and the Respondent was…
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- AAR Rules GST Applies to Small Packaged Shrimp Exports, Citing Retail Packaging Criteria
- Supreme Court to Decide if Leasehold Rights Transfer is Taxable Under GST Law
- Only Entity Named as Exporter in Customs Documents Can Claim Service Tax Refund: CESTAT
- CESTAT: Testing Services to Foreign Clients Qualify as ‘Export of Services’ under FTDR Act
- CESTAT Rules Dell India’s Services to Foreign Affiliates Qualify as Export, Allows Appeal
