In a recent petition filed challenging the amendment in Central GST Rules, 2017 omitting the provision of opportunity of hearing to the assessee before the suspension of GST registration, the Bombay High Court has issued notices to the Central and State Governments. The petitioner, SAT Industries Limited contended that the original Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 21A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 provided that a party shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before passing of a suspension order, which portion has been deleted by a Notification dated 22nd December, 2020. It was further submitted that this goes against the principle of natural justice because the implication of such a suspension is drastic.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- States Worry Over Revenue Losses Amid GST Rate Rationalisation Proposal by Centre
- Madras HC Advocate Accuses Flipkart of Exploiting GST Loopholes, Urges Government Action
- India’s GST Evolution: From 2017 Launch to 2025 Reforms and Future Prospects
- US imposes additional tariffs on India for buying oil from Russia
- GST Council to Discuss Simplifying Tax Regime, Reducing Levies on Cement, Services, and Insurance