If the tax office denies a recipient his input VAT deduction, the recipient, under certain conditions, is granted a direct claim (= so-called Reemtsma claim) against the tax office. Shortly after the Federal Ministry of Finance’s letter, the Fiscal Court of Münster referred a related question to the ECJ (decision of 27 June 2022 – 15 K 2327/20 AO; Schütte – C-453/22). It asked the ECJ to clarify some important questions of application. In essence, this concerns the relationship between the supplier’s VAT adjustment procedure of the unduly charged VAT and the recipient’s Reemtsma claim. It should also be clarified to what extent the beneficiary must take civil action as a matter of priority.
Source: KMLZ
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Right to Deduct VAT and ”Substance over form” concept
- GC VAT Case T-363/25 (UNIX) – Order – VAT deductions can not be denied solely due to invoice trustworthiness if the underlying transactions occurred
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025
- General Court T-773/25 (Finanzamt für Großbetriebe) – Questions – Ex Nunc Implications of Late Invoices in Triangular Transactions
- A Guide to cross-border B2B distribution and tolling transactions in Europe: the staggering cost of VAT
