If the tax office denies a recipient his input VAT deduction, the recipient, under certain conditions, is granted a direct claim (= so-called Reemtsma claim) against the tax office. Shortly after the Federal Ministry of Finance’s letter, the Fiscal Court of Münster referred a related question to the ECJ (decision of 27 June 2022 – 15 K 2327/20 AO; Schütte – C-453/22). It asked the ECJ to clarify some important questions of application. In essence, this concerns the relationship between the supplier’s VAT adjustment procedure of the unduly charged VAT and the recipient’s Reemtsma claim. It should also be clarified to what extent the beneficiary must take civil action as a matter of priority.
Source: KMLZ
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- New GC VAT Case: C-689/25 (British Company) – No details known yey
- CJEU Clarifies VAT Rules for Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Intragroup Transactions
- ETAF Calls for Modern, Harmonised VAT Rules for EU Travel and Tourism Sector Reform
- EU Council Approves Customs Duty Cuts on Ukrainian Agri-Food Products
- EC Report: Three EU Countries Account for 75% of VAT Rate Deviations
