The Court found it sufficiently plausible that the State’s claims were upheld in proceedings on the merits. Because the State also had a sufficiently urgent interest in those claims for the provision of information to the defendants, the Court granted the claims, on the understanding that the relevant data may not be used for tax fines or criminal prosecution insofar as it concerned will-dependent material.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
