The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued an important decision on 7 April 2022 (Berlin Chemie A. Menarini SRL), concluding that a subsidiary that provides exclusive marketing and publicity services to a group company acting as a central entrepreneur does not create a VAT fixed establishment of the central entrepreneur in the country where the subsidiary is resident. The decision further clarifies how and when a VAT fixed establishment is created and the ensuing consequences.
Source BDO
See also
- ECJ C-333/20 (Berlin Chemie A. Menarini SRL) – Judgment – No Fixed establishment via affiliate rendering services on an exclusive basis
- ECJ Cases on Fixed Establishments (Art. 44 & 45)
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Determination of Customs Value and Proof of Origin for Preferential Treatment: Logista v Spanish State
- Determining Customs Value of Goods: Successive Sales and EU Customs Code Interpretation (Case C-500/24)
- Determination of Customs Value and Proof of Origin for Preferential Treatment: Logista v Spanish State
- Determining Customs Value of Goods: Successive Sales and EU Customs Code Interpretation (Case C-500/24)
- Is a Single Authorized Representative Possible for EU Packaging and Battery Regulations?
