VAT – Denial of input tax under the Kittel principle — whether appellant knew or should have known that the only reasonable explanation for the transactions was that they were connected with fraud – assessment of output tax under the Mecsek principle – whether the appellant knew or should have known that the transactions were part of a tax fraud committed by its purchaser, and that it had not taken every reasonable step within its power to prevent its own participation in that fraud
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Overview of UK VAT Late Payment Penalties
- Lancer Scott Ltd v HMRC: VAT Assessment, Penalties, and Time Limit Dispute Dismissed by Tribunal
- Raising VAT Rates: A Solution for Budget Deficit and Economic Growth
- Webb v HMRC: VAT Input Tax Disallowance, Exempt Supplies, No Business Activity, Appeal Dismissed
- How UK VAT Registered Businesses saved £915 million and 49 Million Hours on VAT Compliance (and why you can too)
