Preliminary Ruling of Case No. C-146/21 clarifying VAT rules on sales that company VB sold from timber between 2011 and 2017. The European Court of Justice ruled in favour of Romanian authorities in a case involving a company that failed to register for VAT on supplies of wood. Under the reverse charge system, this should have been subject to VAT.
Source: GVC
See also ECJ C-146/21 (DGRFP Bucureşti) – Judgment – No application of Reverse-Charge before VAT registration
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Rate Changes in 2026: Key Updates for Finland, Lithuania, and Germany
- Amazon Phases Out Commingling: New FNSKU Barcodes Reshape Fulfilment and VAT Compliance
- Delayed EN 16931 Standard Leaves Businesses in Limbo – A Call for Urgent Action
- The EU Commission proposes new collaborative measures in view of ViDA
- How did the EU Member States implemented ”Domestic Reverse-Charge” (Art. 194 of the Directive 2006/112)?
