In Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Capitec Bank Limited (94/2021) [2022] ZASCA 97 (21 June 2022) the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Capitec Bank Limited (‘Capitec’) could not deduct input tax in respect of loan cover payouts to borrowers. This article considers the case, in particular the court’s views on Capitec’s VAT equilibrium.
Source Pieter van der Zwan
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- VAT Fraud Syndicate Threatens South Africa’s Economy, Costs Billions in Lost Revenue and Market Share
- SARS Limits E-Commerce Imports Under Customs Code 70707070 to R150,000 Per Year for Individuals
- How Edward Kieswetter Helped South Africa Avoid a 2% VAT Increase Through Tax Modernisation
- South Africa Clarifies VAT on Sale of Fixed Assets and Joint Venture Interests
- SARS Clarifies Tax on Reinsurance Business Transfer to Nonresident Branch; Dividend and VAT Implications
