In Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Capitec Bank Limited (94/2021) [2022] ZASCA 97 (21 June 2022) the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Capitec Bank Limited (‘Capitec’) could not deduct input tax in respect of loan cover payouts to borrowers. This article considers the case, in particular the court’s views on Capitec’s VAT equilibrium.
Source Pieter van der Zwan
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- EFF Applauds Court Ruling Affirming Only Parliament Can Change South Africa’s VAT Rate
- Court Rules Finance Minister Cannot Unilaterally Raise VAT; DA, EFF Hail Decision
- Court Orders Parliament to Limit Finance Minister’s Power Over VAT Increases
- South African Court Rules VAT Changes Require Parliamentary Approval, Not Ministerial Decree
- High Court Rules Finance Minister Cannot Unilaterally Raise VAT Rate Without Parliamentary Approval
