AG Wattel is of the opinion that the legislator deliberately wants the BCF interest not to start running in the years in which the right to compensation arises. Furthermore, the BCF contribution is not a tax (refund), but a compensation scheme. The mirror corrections are not communicating vessels for tax interest.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
- VAT Implications for ‘Free’ Online Services: Legal Challenges and Potential Impact on SMEs
- Court Denies Tax Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs as Private Expenses
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders