AG Wattel is of the opinion that the legislator deliberately wants the BCF interest not to start running in the years in which the right to compensation arises. Furthermore, the BCF contribution is not a tax (refund), but a compensation scheme. The mirror corrections are not communicating vessels for tax interest.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Appeal on Excise Duty Assessment: Disclosure of Documents, Tax Liability, and Correctness of Tax Assessment
- Appeal to 35-year-old agreements does not inspire confidence that VAT is deductible
- No excusable delay in the event of late VAT refund requests
- Pension fund provides VAT-exempt insurance services during the performance of the benefit agreement
- Additional VAT Assessments Upheld; Misdemeanor Fines Dismissed
