Sanchita Kundu Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)
These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the action of the respondent GST concerned denying the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by their impugned order dated 27th December, 2021 to the petitioner on purchase of the goods in question from the suppliers and asking the petitioners to pay the penalty and interest under the relevant provisions of GST Act, on the ground that the registration of the suppliers in question has already been cancelled with retrospective effect covering the transaction period in question. Petitioner has also challenged the impugned orders dated 29th March, 2022 and 30th March, 2022 respectively being Annexure P-10 to the writ petition, under Section 79(1)(c) of the WBGST Act.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Hotel Rooms ≤ Rs 7,500: 5% Rate, No ITC for Hotels or Business Travellers
- GSTN Releases Key FAQs on GSTR 9/9C Filing for Financial Year 2024-25
- Supreme Court: VAT Credit Cannot Be Denied Due to Supplier’s Tax Default
- Trickiest countries in which to achieve compliance
- India announces changes in the Invoice Management System
