In the case of WTGIL Limited (UKFTT 00131), the FTT held that an insurance intermediary made neither a supply for consideration nor a deemed supply to policyholders in relation to ‘black box’ devices fitted in their cars to analyse their driving. Consequently, input tax was not recoverable in respect of the provision and fitting of the devices.
WTGIL made a claim for over £2 million of input tax incurred between 2014 and 2018, on the basis that the VAT was directly attributable to taxable supplies of the black box devices made to the policyholders (whether or not for consideration).
Source Saffery
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Upper Tribunal Rules Cosmetic Treatments by Medical Professionals Can Qualify for VAT Exemption
- High Court Rules Interest Payable on VAT in Contract Dispute Settlement
- FTT Grants Late VAT Appeal Despite Rejected Review Request Arguments
- Property TOGCs Under the Microscope: Navigating VAT Conditions and HMRC Expectations
- Fintua Sponsors Indirect Taxes Annual Conference 2025 in London (Nov 12)
