In any case, there are serious doubts as to the legality of the contested decision after the 5th Senate of the BFH asked the ECJ for a preliminary ruling on whether the national allocation requirement of Section 4 No. 12 Sentence 2 UStG is compatible with Union law (BFH of May 26, 2021 , VR 22/20, BFH/NV 2021, p. 1316, the procedure is being conducted at the ECJ under file no. C-516/21). The ECJ proposal concerns the tax liability of the rental of permanently installed devices and machines.
BFH, decision of March 7, 2022, XI B 2/21 (ADV) , published on May 19, 2022
Source: haufe.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- German Federal Fiscal Court on Invoice Requirements under VAT Act Section 14c(2)
- VAT: Co-Owners Cannot Be Considered Entrepreneurs
- Germany Moves to Permanently Cut VAT on Gas and Heat Supplies
- Bundesrat Calls for Legal Clarity on VAT for Sports Clubs
- FeRD Publishes ZUGFeRD 2.5 / Factur-X 1.09 (Two-Step Release)
