The Court of Appeal decided that with regard to the products and services auctioned by X all relevant information about that service/delivery was already made known during the auction, so that there was a clearly identifiable performance. This did not alter the fact that the coupon was not always cashed because also in those cases it was clear to the consumer to which performance his bid or the coupon related.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
