The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- New ECJ VAT Case T-680/25 (Mercedes Benz) – No details known yet
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments, 3 AG Opinions till November 13, 2025
