The CEUJ ruled that, simple control or ownership, of another entity is insufficient to create a fixed establishment for VAT purposes. Consequently, a third party location does not inevitably represent a fixed establishment by dint of control/ownership.
Having made that comment, the court impressed that the decision should be made “in the context of the economic and commercial reality”.
The analysis of the place of belonging should recognise that it is not necessary for the fixed establishment to own the resources, but there should be control over these resources in the same way as an “owner”. A fixed establishment is characterised by a suitable structure which enables a business to receive and use services supplied to them for their own needs and not by the decision power of a certain structure that businesses have put in place.
Source Marcus Ward
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-232/24: Where does credit end and debt collection begin?
- ViDA Public Debate: Summary of Implementation Dialogue with Commissioner Hoekstra (European Commission Website)
- CEN Approves Revised EN 16931: A Milestone for ViDA Implementation
- General Court T-638/24 (D GmbH) – AG Opinion – VAT on Intra-Community Acquisitions Not Precluded by Errors
- Commission Backs Italy’s VAT Derogation on certain vehicles Through 2028
