The CEUJ ruled that, simple control or ownership, of another entity is insufficient to create a fixed establishment for VAT purposes. Consequently, a third party location does not inevitably represent a fixed establishment by dint of control/ownership.
Having made that comment, the court impressed that the decision should be made “in the context of the economic and commercial reality”.
The analysis of the place of belonging should recognise that it is not necessary for the fixed establishment to own the resources, but there should be control over these resources in the same way as an “owner”. A fixed establishment is characterised by a suitable structure which enables a business to receive and use services supplied to them for their own needs and not by the decision power of a certain structure that businesses have put in place.
Source Marcus Ward
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- From matchmaker to supplier: deemed supplies and platform classification under EU VAT
- European Commission Report Highlights Uneven VAT Rate Exemptions Across EU Member States
- EU Packaging Regulation Faces Legal Challenges Over Reusability, Plastic Ban, and Deposit Requirements
- European Union Adopts Peppol PINT Billing Standard for E-Invoice Interoperability
- VAT Exemption for Bitcoin Exchange Transactions Under EU Court Ruling
