The CEUJ ruled that, simple control or ownership, of another entity is insufficient to create a fixed establishment for VAT purposes. Consequently, a third party location does not inevitably represent a fixed establishment by dint of control/ownership.
Having made that comment, the court impressed that the decision should be made “in the context of the economic and commercial reality”.
The analysis of the place of belonging should recognise that it is not necessary for the fixed establishment to own the resources, but there should be control over these resources in the same way as an “owner”. A fixed establishment is characterised by a suitable structure which enables a business to receive and use services supplied to them for their own needs and not by the decision power of a certain structure that businesses have put in place.
Source Marcus Ward
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on GC T-646/24: Simplification measure for triangular transactions applicable to fourth link in the chain
- Comments on T-643/24: Playing Music Without Required License Is a Taxable Service
- GC VAT Case T-363/25 (UNIX) – Order – VAT deductions can not be denied solely due to invoice trustworthiness if the underlying transactions occurred
- PEM Zone: Implementation Status and Legal Fragmentation of Revised Origin Rules from January 2026
- Innovative Customs Education Workshop Spurs Collaboration; Final Chance for Universities to Apply for EU Recognition
