The Ohio Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) uses the true object test to distinguish between nontaxable custom software or taxable services. The Ohio Supreme Court directed the BTA to do so for a taxpayer, a bank, that made a purchase of computer software services that allowed the bank to run daily transactions and maintain their accounting and financial records.
Source: salestaxinstitute.com
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Wisconsin – Release Addresses Terminated Penny Production and Resulting Sales and Use Tax Implications
- Washington – Time and Materials Charges and Cost Reimbursements Deemed Part of Taxable Digital Automated Services
- Indiana – New Law Addresses Penny Shortage and Tax Implications of Cash Transaction Rounding
- Illinois – Updated DOR Guidance Addresses In-State Physical Presence, Remittance Thresholds and Sourcing
- Understanding Economic Nexus: Sales Tax Compliance for Online and Multichannel Businesses After Wayfair
