The Allahabad High Court held that section 6 of GST Act is enacted to avoid possibility of conflicting orders and holds no inherent lack of jurisdiction in the impugned order. The petitioner, Ajay Vermaengaged in the business of lubricants. According to the petitioner as per division of work his case for the tax period July, 2017 to March, 2018 was assigned to the Officer of Central Tax but the show cause notice for assessment under section 73 of CGST
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Dine-in, Takeaway, and Delivery App Orders: Rates, Compliance, and Reporting Differences
- Ensuring ITC Compliance: Mastering GSTR-2B Reconciliation and Audit Readiness for 2026
- India’s E-Invoicing Rules: Scope, Formats, Penalties, and Compliance Under the GST Framework
- Continuous Supply of Services Under GST: Legal Criteria Versus Commercial Practice Explained
- Tripura HC: ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s Tax Default
