Amsterdam Court agreed that Y offered X a marketing platform, a meeting place where sellers and consumers could conduct transactions. According to the Court, Y fulfilled the role of intermediary in that context and not that of purchaser or supplier of the products and services offered on that platform. The exchange of the vouchers resulted in Y making payments to X. Those payments, plus the fees that Y withheld therefrom for its services, therefore constituted the fee under which X had made its supplies of goods.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands releases cover letter on ViDA assessment
- VAT on Alcoholic Drinks Included in Theater Ticket: Separate Supply, Standard Rate Applies, No Equality Violation
- VAT on Alcoholic Drinks Served During Theatre Intermissions: Separate Taxation from Admission Fee
- VAT on Theatre Tickets: Alcoholic Drink During Intermission Taxed at Standard Rate, Not Reduced Rate
- VAT on Theatre Ticket with Included Drink: Separate Tax Rates for Admission and Alcoholic Beverage
