The Supreme Court ruled that the periods of vacancy of the recreational bungalow cannot be regarded as periods in which the house is available to X for private purposes. In view of the restrictions arising from the management and rental agreement, X cannot immediately use the house itself.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
- Court Rules Sale-and-Leaseback Property Transfer Not Exempt from Transfer Tax
