In a case involving a bank claiming it was providing nontaxable “personal or professional services” rather than taxable “automatic data processing,” the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed that the bank failed to show it was providing nontaxable accounting services but also remanded the case to determine whether the “true object” of certain transactions is the provision of customized software.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- United States: California to Tax Software Subscriptions Starting in 2027
- California Sales Tax Filing Guide for CDTFA
- Colorado to Tax SaaS: Why Local Sales Tax Rules Are the Hard Part
- US Streamlined Sales Tax Board Approves 2027 Voluntary Disclosure Programme for Remote Sellers
- United States: Washington Denies Refund for Out-of-State EV Sales Tax














