In a case involving a bank claiming it was providing nontaxable “personal or professional services” rather than taxable “automatic data processing,” the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed that the bank failed to show it was providing nontaxable accounting services but also remanded the case to determine whether the “true object” of certain transactions is the provision of customized software.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "United States"
- California Extends Sales Tax Exclusion for Energy Projects Until 2028
- Washington Expands Sales Tax to IT Services, Marketing, and Online Classes
- Illinois Expands Hotel Tax to Short-Term Rental Platforms Like Airbnb Starting 2025
- Arkansas Expands Sales Tax Exemptions for Qualified Large Data Centers Under H.B. 1444
- Texas Comptroller Denies Telecom Equipment Refund for Non-Signal Transmission Items
