For the years 2015 to 2019, Municipality A has taken into account the VAT that applies to the costs of separate collection or the collection and subsequent separation of packaging materials from household waste, the possible sorting of the collected packaging materials and the registration of the collected packaging material. come for a contribution from the BCF. These contributions have been recovered from A. Tax interest is also charged.
The question is whether the contributions from the BCF have been correctly reclaimed from municipality A. More specifically, it is disputed whether A performed the activities in question as an entrepreneur. It is also in dispute whether the tax authorities correctly charged tax interest.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
