Judgment of the ECJ on March 10, 2022 in the case C-177/20 (Grossmania)
Context: Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Primacy – Direct effect – Sincere cooperation – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 63 TFEU – Obligations on a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which contravenes EU law as interpreted by the Court – Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Liability of the Member State
The European Court of Justice rules that the Hungarian court must disapply the Hungarian regulation. The Hungarian legislation is in fact incompatible with Art. 63 TFEU, as evidenced by a preliminary ruling from the EU Court of Justice.
Source
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Exemption” – Currency transactions exclude collectors’ items and numismatic coins
- Comments on T-638/24: Double dip alert – an incorrect invoice can create multiple VAT liabilities
- Comments on ECJ C-409/24 to C-411/24: Accommodation landlords must split supplies for VAT purposes
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: Court Rules Virtual Gold Not Exempt from VAT
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers
