The main issues in this case were:
▪ Did the Taxpayer carry on a taxable activity for GST purposes? If so, did the
Taxpayer claim input tax they were not entitled to?
▪ Was the Taxpayer liable for a shortfall penalty for evasion or a similar act?
TCO decided that:
▪ The Taxpayer did not have a taxable activity in the disputed periods. As a result
the GST assessments made by CCS for the disputed periods were confirmed.
Similarly, CCS’s decision to cancel the Taxpayer’s GST registration from the start
date was also confirmed
Source: govt.nz
Latest Posts in "New Zealand"
- E-Invoicing in New Zealand: Key FAQs, Compliance Steps, and How ecosio Supports Your Journey
- New Zealand’s Phased E-Invoicing Rollout: Government-Led, Peppol Standard, Mandatory for Large Suppliers 2027
- New Zealand’s Phased E-Invoicing Rollout: Peppol Standard, Government-Led, Mandatory for Large B2G Suppliers 2027
- Briefing Document & Podcast: E-Invoicing and E-Reporting in New Zealand
- New Zealand GST Rules for Foreign Digital Service Providers and Online Marketplaces













