Advocate General IJzerman argues that, although the interested party acted incorrectly, arguments can be made for the latter’s position that by including VAT debts in the corporate income tax return they have complied with the obligation to file a supplementary return.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
